UPSC CARE Mains Practice 5th February 2026
Mains Practice Questions for the Day
- The Finance Commission plays a critical role in maintaining fiscal federalism in India. Discuss its functions and evaluate the challenges it faces in addressing Vertical Fiscal Imbalance (VFI). Suggest measures to strengthen its effectiveness.” (GS Paper: II – Centre–State Relations, Constitutional Bodies, Cooperative Federalism)
- How do the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026 seek to address India’s burgeoning solid waste problem? Critically examine the key changes introduced over the 2016 Rules and assess their potential in promoting a circular economy. (GS Paper III – Environment)
The Finance Commission plays a critical role in maintaining fiscal federalism in India. Discuss its functions and evaluate the challenges it faces in addressing Vertical Fiscal Imbalance (VFI). Suggest measures to strengthen its effectiveness.” (GS Paper: II – Centre–State Relations, Constitutional Bodies, Cooperative Federalis
Introduction:
The Finance Commission is a constitutional body established under Article 280 of the Indian Constitution to recommend the distribution of financial resources between the Union and the States. It acts as a key institutional mechanism for promoting cooperative federalism and ensuring fiscal equity across regions. The establishment of the 16th Finance Commission, chaired by Dr. Arvind Panagariya, comes at a time when concerns over Vertical Fiscal Imbalance (VFI) and Centre–State financial relations are intensifying.
Body
Role and Functions of the Finance Commission
1. Tax Devolution
- Recommends vertical devolution, i.e., the share of States in the Centre’s net tax revenue.
- Determines horizontal devolution, distributing funds among States based on criteria such as population, income distance, geography, and demographic performance.
2. Grants-in-Aid
- Suggests principles for providing grants from the Consolidated Fund of India under Article 275.
- Helps bridge fiscal gaps and supports weaker States.
3. Strengthening Local Governments
- Recommends measures to augment resources of Panchayats and Municipalities, deepening grassroots democracy.
4. Disaster Financing
- Reviews disaster management funding frameworks and recommends improvements under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.
Understanding Vertical Fiscal Imbalance (VFI)
Vertical Fiscal Imbalance arises when expenditure responsibilities exceed revenue-raising powers.
- States account for ~61% of public expenditure but generate only ~38% of total revenue.
- This dependency increases reliance on central transfers, potentially constraining fiscal autonomy.
Importance of Reducing VFI:
- Enhances efficiency in public spending.
- Enables better crisis management.
- Strengthens federal balance and democratic decentralisation.
Key Challenges Faced by the Finance Commission
1. Growing Use of Cesses and Surcharges
- Nearly 23% of gross tax revenue comes from these sources, which are not shareable with States, shrinking the divisible pool.
2. Political Economy Concerns
- Since the Commission is appointed by the Centre, perceptions of political bias sometimes emerge.
3. Implementation Gap
- Recommendations are advisory; partial acceptance by the Union may dilute intended outcomes.
4. Inter-State Equity Debate
- Southern and industrialised States argue they receive less despite higher contributions and better demographic performance.
5. Rising Fiscal Pressures
- Welfare demands, infrastructure needs, and climate-related expenditures increase State financial stress.
Measures to Strengthen the Finance Commission
1. Expand the Divisible Tax Pool
- Limit excessive reliance on cesses and surcharges.
2. Increase Tax Devolution
- Consider raising States’ share to improve fiscal autonomy.
3. Enhance Transparency
- Adopt objective and data-driven criteria to reduce political perceptions.
4. Incentivise Fiscal Responsibility
- Reward States for tax effort, governance reforms, and demographic management.
5. Strengthen Cooperative Federalism
- Promote structured Centre–State fiscal dialogue to resolve disputes.
Conclusion:
The Finance Commission remains the cornerstone of India’s fiscal federal architecture. Addressing Vertical Fiscal Imbalance is essential not only for equitable development but also for preserving the spirit of cooperative federalism. A stronger, more transparent, and empowered Finance Commission can ensure that fiscal decentralisation keeps pace with India’s evolving economic and governance challenges.
How do the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026 seek to address India’s burgeoning solid waste problem? Critically examine the key changes introduced over the 2016 Rules and assess their potential in promoting a circular economy. (GS Paper III – Environment)
Introduction:
India is facing a severe solid waste management crisis, generating over 620 lakh tonnes of waste annually and about 1.85 lakh tonnes daily, with significant quantities still ending up in landfills. Recognising the limitations of the Solid Waste Management (SWM) Rules, 2016, the Union Government notified the SWM Rules, 2026, which come into force from April 1, 2026, with the objective of shifting India from a landfill-centric approach to a circular economy–based waste governance framework.
Body
Key Features of SWM Rules, 2026 and How They Address the Crisis
1. Waste Hierarchy and Four-Way Segregation
- Introduces a waste hierarchy prioritising prevention, reduction, reuse, recycling and recovery, with disposal as a last resort.
- Mandates four-stream segregation at source:
- Wet waste
- Dry waste
- Sanitary waste
- Special-care waste
- This improves recycling efficiency and reduces landfill burden compared to the wet–dry segregation under the 2016 Rules.
2. Enhanced Accountability of Bulk Waste Generators
- Clearly defines Bulk Waste Generators (BWGs) based on area, water use or waste generation.
- Introduces Extended Bulk Waste Generator Responsibility (EBWGR) through:
- Mandatory registration
- Certification-based compliance
- On-site wet waste processing or procurement of compliance certificates
- This addresses the earlier weak enforcement regime for large waste producers.
3. Polluter Pays Principle
- Provides for environmental compensation for non-compliance, false reporting and improper waste handling.
- Imposes higher landfill fees for unsegregated waste, making landfilling economically unattractive.
- Marks a shift from advisory compliance to deterrence-based regulation.
4. Digital Monitoring and Transparency
- Establishes a centralised online portal to track the entire waste lifecycle.
- Mandatory registration of ULBs, BWGs, waste processors, transporters and large institutions.
- Reduces data gaps and improves regulatory oversight.
5. Landfill Minimisation and Legacy Waste Remediation
- Restricts landfills only to non-recyclable and non-energy-recoverable waste.
- Mandates mapping and time-bound biomining and bioremediation of legacy dumpsites.
- Promotes energy recovery from high-calorific waste through Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF), with industries required to substitute fossil fuels progressively up to 15%.
Critical Assessment
While the Rules are progressive, challenges remain:
- Capacity constraints of Urban Local Bodies
- Behavioural change needed among citizens and housing societies
- Enforcement consistency across States
However, the digital monitoring framework and financial disincentives significantly strengthen compliance mechanisms.
Conclusion:
The Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026 represent a decisive policy shift towards circular economy–oriented waste governance, combining segregation, accountability, technology and economic instruments. If effectively implemented, they can reduce landfill dependence, improve environmental outcomes and transform waste from a liability into a resource, addressing one of India’s most pressing urban-environmental challenges.