UPSC Daily Current Affairs - 13th February 2026
Relevance:
GS Paper II (Governance & Regulatory Framework), GS Paper III (Energy, Infrastructure, Disaster Management)
For Prelims:
- SHANTI Act, Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act (CLNDA) 2010, Nuclear Fission, Supplier Indemnity, Right of Recourse, Liability Cap, Special Drawing Rights (SDR), Atomic Energy Act 1962, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)
For Mains:
- Nuclear Liability Regime, No-Fault Liability, Absolute Liability Principle, Moral Hazard, Regulatory Independence, Private Sector Participation in Nuclear Energy, Energy Security vs Public Safety, Disaster Compensation Framework, International Nuclear Conventions, Governance and Accountability in Hazardous Industries
Why in News?
Parliament recently passed the SHANTI Act, which opens India’s nuclear power sector to private participation and significantly amends the liability framework under the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act (CLNDA), 2010. The changes — particularly on supplier indemnity and liability caps — have triggered debate on safety, accountability, and economic feasibility.
What is Nuclear Energy?
Nuclear energy is the use of controlled atomic reactions to produce power. At its core, it relies on splitting atoms in a process called fission, which releases large amounts of heat. This heat is then used to generate electricity without producing greenhouse gases. Globally, nuclear energy is valued as a clean, dependable source that complements renewable options like solar and wind.
Salient Provisions of the Act
1. Participation of the Private Sector
The Act allows private entities — including companies, joint ventures, or any person specifically authorised by the Central Government — to engage in India’s nuclear energy sector.
They may undertake activities such as:
- Operation of nuclear power plants and generation of electricity
- Manufacturing of nuclear equipment
- Fabrication of nuclear fuel, including conversion processes
- Refining and enrichment of Uranium-235 up to a prescribed limit
- Production, handling, processing, or disposal of other notified radioactive substances
However, any activity involving radiation exposure requires prior safety clearance from the designated regulatory authority.
2. Activities Reserved for the Central Government
Strategically sensitive components of the nuclear fuel cycle remain under the exclusive control of the Central Government or its wholly owned entities.
These include:
- Enrichment of radioactive materials beyond specified limits
- Management and disposal of spent nuclear fuel
- Other critical fuel-cycle operations deemed sensitive
This ensures national security and strategic oversight.
3. Statutory Status to the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB)
The Act grants statutory backing to the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) to enhance its autonomy and regulatory authority.
- Originally constituted in 1983 under the Atomic Energy Act
- Now accountable to Parliament rather than functioning solely under executive control
- Responsible for nuclear safety, radiation protection, emergency response planning, and quality assurance in civilian nuclear facilities
This provision strengthens institutional independence in nuclear regulation.
4. Introduction of a New Civil Liability Framework
The legislation establishes a structured and graded liability mechanism for nuclear operators.
Liability Limits:
- ₹3,000 crore for large nuclear power plants
- ₹1,500 crore for medium-sized plants
- ₹100 crore for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)
Any liability exceeding these limits will be covered by the Government through a dedicated Nuclear Liability Fund.
Importantly, the Act eliminates supplier liability, unlike the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010 (CLNDA), which allowed claims against suppliers for defective equipment.
5. Regulation of Non-Power Nuclear Applications
The Act also regulates the peaceful use of nuclear and radiation technologies in:
- Healthcare
- Agriculture
- Industry
- Scientific research
- Other civilian applications
This ensures safety compliance beyond electricity generation.
6. Licensing and Safety Regulation
A comprehensive framework is introduced for:
- Granting licences
- Suspending licences
- Cancelling licences
- Issuing safety authorisations
Limited exemptions may be provided for research, development, and innovation activities under defined conditions.
7. Acquisition Powers of the Central Government
The Central Government is vested with exclusive rights to acquire assets or facilities in specific circumstances related to nuclear activities, ensuring strategic control where required.
8. Dispute Resolution Framework
The Act establishes:
• Atomic Energy Redressal Advisory Council
To facilitate settlement of disputes relating to nuclear operations.
• Nuclear Damage Claims Commission
To adjudicate cases involving major nuclear damage and ensure timely compensation.
9. Territorial Scope of Compensation
Compensation provisions extend to nuclear damage occurring outside India if the incident originates within Indian territory, subject to prescribed conditions.
10. Appellate Mechanism
Appeals against decisions under the Act will lie before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (constituted under the Electricity Act, 2003).
Evolution of India’s Nuclear Legal Framework
India’s nuclear energy programme has evolved through key legislative milestones aimed at ensuring the peaceful use of atomic energy, while maintaining strong state oversight and public safety. Over time, these laws have reflected India’s increasing institutional capacity and strategic confidence in managing nuclear technology.
Atomic Energy Act, 1962
- Replaced the Atomic Energy Act of 1948.
- Established the legal foundation for India’s nuclear programme.
- Empowered the Central Government to regulate atomic energy strictly for peaceful purposes.
- Ensured state control over research, development, production, and use of nuclear materials.
Amendments to the Atomic Energy Act (1986, 1987, 2015)
- Gradually broadened participation in nuclear power generation beyond direct Central Government control.
- Enabled government-owned companies and joint ventures to engage in nuclear energy production.
- Reflected India’s objective to expand nuclear capacity while retaining strategic and regulatory oversight.
Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act (CLNDA), 2010
- Introduced a no-fault liability framework for nuclear accidents.
- Clearly defined responsibility for compensation in case of nuclear damage.
- Strengthened public confidence by embedding principles of safety, accountability, and victim compensation into the nuclear regime.
Why Supplier Indemnity Is Controversial
Historical nuclear disasters show that design defects often contribute to catastrophic accidents:
- Fukushima (2011): Flaws in containment design worsened the disaster.
- Chernobyl (1986): Reactor design deficiencies were central to the accident.
- Three Mile Island (1979): Control room design flaws and supplier communication failures were identified.
Despite such precedents, the SHANTI Act shields suppliers from civil and criminal liability in India. Critics argue that this lacks scientific and ethical justification.
International pressure — particularly from U.S. suppliers — reportedly influenced India to align liability norms with global conventions favourable to equipment manufacturers.
Liability Cap vs. Potential Damage
The liability ceiling under the Act is about ₹3,900 crore, while:
- Fukushima’s estimated cost may reach ₹46 lakh crore.
- Chernobyl-related losses in Belarus alone were about ₹21 lakh crore.
Thus, the cap is roughly one thousand times lower than potential damage. Even with supplementary international compensation mechanisms, total payouts may not exceed 1% of actual losses in a worst-case scenario.
Moral Hazard and Safety Concerns
Capping liability and indemnifying suppliers may create moral hazard — reducing incentives to invest in safety.
Additionally:
- The Act exempts operators from liability for accidents caused by “grave natural disasters,” even though Fukushima was triggered by a tsunami.
- This weakens India’s earlier “absolute liability” principle for hazardous industries.
Nuclear Energy’s Limited Role in India
- Nuclear power contributes only about 3% of India’s electricity generation.
- Targets have consistently been missed:
- 10 GW by 2000 → achieved only 2.86 GW
- 20 GW by 2020 → achieved 6.78 GW
- High capital costs and safety concerns remain systemic obstacles.
- Proposed Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are largely untested and expensive.
- The new 100 GW by 2047 target appears ambitious and potentially unrealistic.
Economic Implications
Nuclear reactors present significant commercial opportunities. For example, two AP1000 reactors in the U.S. cost around $18 billion each.
The SHANTI Act creates a framework in which:
- Private Indian and multinational corporations can enter the nuclear market.
- Liability risks are significantly reduced for suppliers and operators.
- Regulatory oversight may be constrained.
Conclusion
The SHANTI Act represents a structural shift in India’s nuclear energy policy. While it aims to attract private investment and expand capacity, critics argue that supplier indemnity, liability caps, and regulatory dilution may compromise safety and accountability.
Given nuclear energy’s modest contribution to India’s power mix and past capacity shortfalls, the debate centres on whether the economic benefits justify the potential risks to public safety and environmental security.
UPSC PYQ
Basic scientific principle behind a nuclear reactor is: (NDA–I, 2019)
- Nuclear fusion
- Controlled nuclear fusion
- Uncontrolled nuclear fission
- Controlled nuclear fission
- In nuclear fission, a heavy nucleus such as Uranium-235 splits into smaller nuclei.
- This process releases:
- A large amount of heat energy
- Additional neutrons
- The released neutrons sustain a chain reaction.
- The chain reaction is carefully controlled using control rods (made of neutron-absorbing materials like cadmium or boron).
- This ensures steady heat production, which is used to generate electricity.
CARE MCQ
Match the following Nuclear Power Plants with their respective Locations:
| Nuclear Power Plant | Location |
| 1. Tarapur Atomic Power Station | A. Rajasthan |
| 2. Rajasthan Atomic Power Station | B. Tamil Nadu |
| 3. Kakrapar Atomic Power Station | C. Maharashtra |
| 4. Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant | D. Gujarat |
Which of the following pairs are correctly matched?
1–C, 2–A, 3–D, 4–B
1–A, 2–C, 3–D, 4–B
1–C, 2–D, 3–A, 4–B
1–D, 2–A, 3–C, 4–B
Answer: A
Explanation:
1. Tarapur Atomic Power Station – Maharashtra
- Located in Maharashtra.
- One of India’s oldest nuclear power plants.
2. Rajasthan Atomic Power Station – Rajasthan
- Located at Rawatbhata in Rajasthan.
3. Kakrapar Atomic Power Station – Gujarat
- Located in Gujarat.
4. Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant – Tamil Nadu
- Located in Tamil Nadu.
- Uses Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) technology.
Relevance:
GS Paper III – Agriculture, GS Paper III – Science & Technology (Digital Public Infrastructure)
For Prelims:
- Digital Agriculture Mission, AgriStack components, Farmer Registry, Crop Sown Registry, Geo-referenced village maps, AI in agriculture
For Mains:
- Inclusive growth, governance, DBT reforms
Why in News?
- In the Union Budget 2026, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman described AgriStack as “one of the next UPI” initiatives, highlighting its transformational potential for Indian agriculture.
- She announced Bharat-VISTAAR (Virtually Integrated System to Access Agricultural Resources) — a multilingual AI platform that will integrate AgriStack portals with agricultural best-practice packages developed by Indian Council of Agricultural Research.
- The government plans to phase-wise connect AgriStack with major schemes such as Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) and Minimum Support Price (MSP) procurement to improve efficiency and transparency.
What is AgriStack?
- AgriStack is a Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) for India’s agriculture sector.
- It was launched in 2024 under the Digital Agriculture Mission.
- Its goal is to consolidate farmer and agricultural data onto a single digital platform.
- The system aims to:
- Improve farm productivity
- Enable data-driven decision-making
- Provide customised advisory services
- Reduce risks for farmers
Why is it called the “next UPI”?
- Like Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transformed digital payments, AgriStack aims to digitally transform agriculture.
- It will connect farmers with:
- Government schemes
- Financial services
- Insurance
- Procurement systems
- Advisory platforms
Three Foundational Registries of AgriStack
1. Farmer Registry
- Provides each farmer with a unique digital Farmer ID (similar to Aadhaar).
- Linked to:
- Land records
- Crops grown
- Livestock ownership
- Demographic & family details
- Benefits and schemes availed
- Target: 11 crore farmers (about 8.62 crore already created).
- Reduces paperwork and minimizes physical visits to offices.
2.Crop Sown Registry
- Contains season-wise data on crops planted.
- Data collected through mobile-based digital crop surveys.
- Target: 30 crore farm plots across 604 districts by Kharif 2026.
- Over 70% coverage already in several states.
3.Geo-referenced Village Maps
- Maps land records with precise geographic coordinates (latitude & longitude).
- 5.4 lakh villages mapped so far out of 6.75 lakh.
- Target completion: March 2027.
How AgriStack Will Help Farmers
- Integration with major services such as:
- Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT)
- Minimum Support Price (MSP) procurement
- Fertiliser distribution
- Crop loans
- Insurance
- Storage
- Advisory services
Expected benefits:
- Faster approvals
- Leak-proof subsidy transfers
- Reduced documentation
- Better access to credit and insurance
- More equitable fertiliser distribution
Other Outcomes of Digital Agriculture Initiatives
1. Digital Crop Survey (DCS)
- Provides plot-level crop visibility.
- Helps estimate sowing patterns across seasons.
- Supports evidence-based planning for:
- Procurement
- Input supply
- Logistics
- Kharif 2025: Conducted in 604 districts, covering 28.5+ crore plots.
State-Level Success Examples
Maharashtra
- Used AgriStack for:
- Scheme delivery
- Disaster relief
- AI-based advisory
- Credit access
- ₹14,000+ crore transferred to 89 lakh farmers for crop losses.
Chhattisgarh
- Institutionalized Farmer ID + DCS for MSP-based paddy procurement.
- Covered 32+ lakh farmers in one season.
- Improved:
- Transparency
- Crop verification
- Timeliness of payments
2. Krishi Decision Support System
- Geo-spatial platform integrating:
- Satellite imagery
- Weather data
- Soil data
- Crop data
- Uses GIS to support agricultural planning and decision-making.
- Provides targeted advisories on crops, soil, and weather.
3. Kisan e-Mitra
- Voice-based AI chatbot for farmer queries (initially PM-KISAN).
- Supports 11 regional languages.
- Handles 8,000+ queries daily.
- 95 lakh+ queries answered so far.
4. National Pest Surveillance System
- Uses AI & Machine Learning to detect pest infestations.
- Enables timely intervention to reduce crop losses.
- Used by 10,000+ extension workers.
- Covers 65 crops and 400+ pests.
- Farmers can upload pest images for guidance.
5. Namo Drone Didi
- Central Sector Scheme to provide 15,000 drones to Women SHGs.
- Outlay: ₹1,261 crore (2023–26).
- Goals:
- Promote advanced agricultural technology
- Improve crop yield
- Reduce operational costs
- Empower rural women
- 500 drones already distributed.
- Study shows:
- Diversified SHG activities
- Improved farm practices
- Increased income opportunities
6.Seed Authenticity Traceability & Holistic Inventory (SATHI)
- Digital platform for:
- Seed production
- Quality certification
- Distribution
- Traceability
- Establishes a National Seed Grid integrating all seed stakeholders into one system.
Current Use Cases
- Farmer ID used for registration under PM-KISAN.
- Some states use it for Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (crop insurance) enrollment.
- Pilot projects have enabled:
- Faster MSP procurement
- Streamlined fertiliser supply
- KCC loan disbursement
UPSC PYQ
What is/are the advantage/advantages of implementing the ‘National Agriculture Market’ scheme? (2017)
- It is a pan-India electronic trading portal for agricultural commodities.
- It provides the farmers access to nationwide market, with prices commensurate with the quality of their produce.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Ans: (c)
CARE MCQ
With reference to AgriStack, consider the following statements:
- AgriStack is a Digital Public Infrastructure aimed at integrating farmer-related data on a single platform.
- Each farmer is assigned a unique digital identity similar to Aadhaar.
- Bharat-VISTAAR is a blockchain-based platform for agricultural exports.
- AgriStack is expected to support DBT and MSP procurement systems.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
A) 1, 2 and 4 only
B) 2 and 3 only
C) 1 and 3 only
D) All of the above
Answer: A
Explanation:
- Statements 1 and 2 are core features of AgriStack.
- Statement 3 is incorrect — Bharat-VISTAAR is an AI-enabled multilingual integration tool, not blockchain-based.
- Statement 4 is correct since scheme convergence is a major objective.



