UPSC Current Affairs 7 July 2026 featuring today's key current affairs topics

Relevance: UPSC GS Paper III: Agriculture, Inflation, Food Security, Economic Growth, Disaster

Important Keywords for Prelims and Mains

For Prelims:

  • El Niño, South-West Monsoon, IMD, Kharif Season, Reservoir Storage, Food Inflation, GVA

For Mains:

  • Monsoon-dependent economy, rural demand, farm income, climate risk, drought-proofing, food security, inflation management

Why in News?

India’s monsoon outlook has raised concerns after the first month of the season recorded a rainfall deficit of nearly 40%. The India Meteorological Department has also forecast below-normal rainfall in July, meaning rainfall may remain below 94% of the usual level for the month.The concern has grown because a weak monsoon, especially under the influence of El Niño, can affect agriculture, food prices, rural income, hydropower generation, drinking water availability and overall economic growth.

What is El Niño?

  • El Niño refers to the unusual warming of sea surface waters in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean. It occurs once every few years and affects global weather patterns, including the Indian monsoon.
  • The term El Niño means “Little Boy” or “Christ Child” in Spanish. South American fishermen noticed unusually warm waters in the Pacific Ocean around December, near Christmas. Earlier, it was also called El Niño de Navidad.

Mechanism of El Niño

Normally, easterly trade winds blow from the Americas towards Asia across the equatorial Pacific. These winds push warm surface water towards the western Pacific.

During El Niño:

  • Sea surface temperature rises in the central-east equatorial Pacific.
  • Trade winds weaken or change direction.
  • Warm water moves from the western Pacific towards the Americas.
  • The cold Humboldt or Peruvian Current weakens.
  • Upwelling of cold, nutrient-rich deep water near Peru reduces.

Impact on Marine Ecosystem

During normal conditions, upwelling brings nutrient-rich water to the surface. This supports phytoplankton, which forms the base of the marine food chain.

During El Niño:

  • Upwelling decreases.
  • Phytoplankton growth reduces.
  • Fish dependent on phytoplankton are affected.
  • Higher organisms in the food chain are also affected.
  • Warm water may carry tropical species into colder regions, disturbing marine ecosystems.

Impact on Global Weather

The Pacific Ocean covers nearly one-third of the Earth’s surface. Therefore, changes in Pacific sea temperature and wind patterns influence global climate.

El Niño may cause:

  • Drought in Indonesia and Australia
  • Increased flood risk in parts of the United States
  • Dry and warm winter in Northern U.S. and Canada
  • Southward and eastward shift of the Pacific jet stream
  • Disturbance in normal atmospheric circulation
INDIA METEOROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT (IMD)

 

IMD is India’s national weather agency and the principal government body for meteorology.

About IMD

  • Established in 1875.
  • Works under the Ministry of Earth Sciences.
  • Headquarters: New Delhi.
  • Head: Director General of Meteorology.
  • Operates weather observation stations in India and Antarctica.

Regional Centres

  • IMD has 6 Regional Meteorological Centres located at Mumbai, Chennai, New Delhi, Kolkata, Nagpur and Guwahati. Each centre is headed by a Deputy Director General.

Major Functions

  • IMD provides weather forecasts for important sectors such as agriculture, aviation, shipping and offshore oil exploration. It also issues warnings for severe weather events like cyclones, heavy rain, snowfall, dust storms, heat waves and cold waves.

Global Role

  • IMD is one of the six Regional Specialized Meteorological Centres of the World Meteorological Organization. It is responsible for forecasting, naming and issuing warnings for tropical cyclones in the Northern Indian Ocean region.

Why Monsoon Matters for India’s Economy

A poor monsoon affects the economy through three major channels.

Agricultural Output:

  • Lower rainfall can reduce kharif sowing, damage standing crops and lower farm productivity.

Rural Income:

  • When farm output falls, rural purchasing power weakens. This reduces demand for goods and services in rural areas.

Inflation:

  • Poor rainfall can reduce the supply of food items and push up prices, especially vegetables, pulses, cereals and edible oils.
  • Agriculture contributes nearly one-fifth of India’s Gross Value Added, but it supports a much larger population. Around 46% of the workforce depends on agriculture, and nearly 55% of the population is connected with it directly or indirectly.
  • Therefore, even if agriculture’s share in GDP is limited, its impact on livelihood, demand and inflation is very large.

Impact on Agriculture and Kharif Output

  • India entered the current kharif season from a strong position. Foodgrain production in 2024-25 rose to 357.73 million metric tonnes, an increase of 25.43 million metric tonnes over the previous year.
  • A weak monsoon can put this momentum at risk.
  • Farmers may alter cropping decisions depending on rainfall, irrigation, input costs, Minimum Support Price, procurement support and market prices.

For example:

  • Paddy acreage may expand in irrigated regions such as Punjab and Haryana.
  • Maize acreage may decline if farmers shift to more remunerative crops.
  • Pulses may be preferred because they require less water and lower cultivation costs.
  • Vegetables may be avoided by some farmers because of high risk under uncertain rainfall.

Such changes can affect food supply, crop prices and rural incomes.

Effect on Rural Demand

  • A weak monsoon does not affect only farmers. It also affects the wider rural economy.

When farm income falls, demand declines in sectors such as:

  • Two-wheelers
  • Tractors
  • Farm equipment
  • Construction
  • Real estate in small towns
  • Rural consumer goods
  • The rural non-farm economy is closely linked with agricultural income. If agriculture suffers, local services, labour demand and small businesses also weaken.
  • Some estimates suggest that a combined El Niño plus drought situation may reduce India’s GDP growth by 20 to 65 basis points.

Inflation and Food Prices

  • A weak monsoon can worsen food inflation.
  • The Reserve Bank of India has warned that an adverse south-west monsoon may affect the domestic growth-inflation outlook.
  • Food prices had already shown pressure, with items such as:
  • Edible oils
  • Potatoes
  • Onions
  • Tomatoes
  • If rainfall remains weak, supply disruptions may intensify and food and beverage inflation may rise further.
  • This creates a policy dilemma. The government and RBI may have to balance growth support with inflation control.

Fertiliser and Import Pressures

  • A weak monsoon can also increase pressure on input and trade management.
  • The Union Cabinet has approved a ₹41,533 crore Nutrient-Based Subsidy for phosphatic and potassic fertilisers for the kharif season, covering 28 grades.
  • If domestic crop output falls, India may need to release buffer stocks or import essential commodities.

This can:

  • Increase pressure on the current account deficit
  • Raise import bills
  • Put pressure on the rupee
  • Affect food subsidy and fiscal management
  • Agricultural exports may also face stress. Agriculture exports grew at a compound annual growth rate of 8.2% between 2020 and 2025, contributing around 12% to India’s core exports. A weak monsoon can reduce exportable surplus.

Lessons from Past El Niño Years

  • Several of India’s major drought years coincided with El Niño conditions, including 1972, 1982, 2009 and 2015.
  • Since 2000, many below-normal or deficient monsoon years have been linked with El Niño. However, the economic impact has varied depending on policy preparedness.

2009 Experience:

  • The monsoon failure caused serious agricultural stress. Crop GVA contracted, and food inflation entered double digits.

2015 Experience:

  • El Niño conditions again disrupted the monsoon. However, inflation remained relatively moderate due to better food management, controlled MSP increases and lower global commodity prices.
  • This shows that El Niño is a climate shock, but its economic impact depends on public policy, irrigation, food stocks, imports and inflation management.

Irrigation and Reservoir Concerns

  • India’s ability to handle a weak monsoon depends heavily on irrigation and water storage.
  • The Agriculture Minister highlighted that 315 districts are vulnerable to a poor monsoon. Of these, 111 districts across 12 States are of primary concern because of weak irrigation facilities.
  • Reservoir storage is also a concern. Storage across 166 reservoirs monitored by the Central Water Commission stood at 47.725 BCM on July 2, lower than 78.077 BCM during the same period last year and slightly below the normal level for this period.
  • A poor monsoon after already weak storage conditions can strain irrigation, drinking water supply and hydropower generation.

Need for Drought-Proofing India’s Economy

  • India needs to move from reactive drought relief to proactive drought-risk reduction.
  • Crop insurance alone cannot fully protect farmers if drought risk itself remains high. The focus should shift towards reducing vulnerability before a crisis occurs.

Drought-proofing requires:

  • Stronger irrigation networks
  • Efficient water storage
  • Drought-resistant crop varieties
  • Better seed access
  • Climate-resilient cropping patterns
  • Local water conservation
  • Timely advisories for farmers
  • Strong public investment in rural infrastructure

The goal should be to reduce the dependence of rural incomes on uncertain rainfall.

Way Forward

Strengthen Irrigation:

Expand irrigation coverage, especially in vulnerable districts with poor water access.

Improve Reservoir and Groundwater Management:

Water storage, recharge and efficient distribution must be improved before drought years become severe.

Promote Climate-Resilient Crops:

Farmers should have access to drought-resistant, high-yielding seeds.

Diversify Cropping Patterns:

Water-intensive crops should be rationalised in water-stressed areas.

Use Early Warning Systems:

IMD forecasts should be linked with crop advisories, fertiliser planning and market preparedness.

Strengthen Food Management:

Buffer stocks, imports and price stabilisation measures must be used in time to control inflation.

Support Rural Demand:

Employment schemes, income support and rural credit can cushion the demand shock.

Invest in Climate Adaptation:

Public investment is needed in watershed development, micro-irrigation, climate-smart agriculture and rural infrastructure.

Conclusion

El Niño remains a major risk for India because the monsoon continues to influence agriculture, food prices, rural income and economic growth.A weak monsoon can reduce farm output, raise inflation, weaken rural demand and affect exports. However, the damage is not inevitable. Past experiences show that strong food management, irrigation support, public investment and timely policy action can reduce the economic impact.India must therefore focus on drought-proofing its economy through climate-resilient agriculture, better water management and stronger rural safety nets.

UPSC PYQ

Q. Which one of the following is not a resultant of the El Niño effect? (CDS – I, 2022)

(a) Distortion of equatorial atmospheric circulation
(b) Flow of the South-East Trade Winds towards the Indian Ocean
(c) Irregularities in the evaporation of sea water
(d) Reduction in the amount of planktons which reduces the number of fish in the sea

Answer: (b)

Explanation

El Niño is caused by the unusual warming of surface waters in the eastern and central equatorial Pacific Ocean.

During El Niño:

  • The normal equatorial atmospheric circulation gets disturbed.
  • The trade winds weaken or become irregular.
  • Evaporation and rainfall patterns change.
  • Upwelling of cold, nutrient-rich water reduces.
  • This reduces planktons, which affects fish population.

Therefore, the flow of South-East Trade Winds towards the Indian Ocean is not a resultant of El Niño effect.

CARE MCQ

Q. With reference to ENSO, consider the following statements:

  1. ENSO has three phases: El Niño, La Niña and Neutral.
  2. El Niño is linked with unusual warming of surface waters in the eastern Pacific Ocean.
  3. La Niña generally weakens the Indian southwest monsoon.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All the three
(d) None

Answer: (b)

Explanation:

  • Statement 1 is correct: ENSO has three phases: El Niño, La Niña and Neutral.
  • Statement 2 is correct: El Niño is associated with unusual warming of eastern Pacific surface waters.
  • Statement 3 is incorrect: La Niña generally supports a stronger Indian southwest monsoon, though extreme rainfall may also cause floods.

FAQs

1. What is El Niño?

El Niño is the abnormal warming of the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean, which can disturb global weather patterns.

2. How does El Niño affect India?

It can weaken the south-west monsoon and increase the risk of below-normal rainfall.

3. Why is monsoon important for India’s economy?

It affects agriculture, food prices, rural income, water supply and hydropower generation.

4. What was the monsoon deficit in the first month?

The first month of the monsoon recorded a deficit of about 40%.

5. What does below-normal rainfall mean?

It generally means rainfall below 94% of the usual level for that period.

6. How can a poor monsoon affect inflation?

It can reduce food supply and push up prices of vegetables, pulses, cereals and edible oils.

7. Which sectors feel rural demand stress early?

Two-wheelers, tractors, rural construction and small-town real estate are often affected early.

8. Which major drought years were linked with El Niño?

Major drought years include 1972, 1982, 2009 and 2015.

9. Why was 2009 economically damaging?

Crop output contracted and food inflation rose sharply.

Relevance: UPSC GS Paper II: Indian Polity, Constitution, Fundamental Rights, Judiciary, Rule of Law

Important Keywords for Prelims and Mains

For Prelims:

  • Article 22(1), Article 21, Article 14, Article 39A, Bar Council of India Rules, Fair Trial, Legal Aid, Contempt of Courts Act

For Mains:

  • Rule of law, access to justice, right to counsel, professional ethics, constitutional morality, fair trial, legal representation

Why in News?

The Faizabad/Ayodhya Bar Association reportedly passed a resolution stating that its members would not represent the accused in the alleged Ayodhya Ram Temple funds embezzlement case.

The resolution raised an important constitutional question: Can a Bar Association collectively prevent lawyers from representing a particular accused?

The legal position is clear. Such resolutions are illegal, unconstitutional and contrary to professional ethics.

Core Legal Issue

A criminal trial is not decided by public anger, social reputation or the popularity of the accused. It is decided by law, evidence and judicial procedure.

Even a person accused of the most serious offence has the right to be defended in court. A Bar Association cannot collectively deny this right by passing a boycott resolution.

The issue involves two connected rights:

  • The right of the accused to legal representation.
  • The professional freedom and duty of an advocate to appear for a client.

Constitutional Right of an Accused

Article 22(1): Right to Counsel

Article 22(1) of the Constitution says that no arrested person shall be denied the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.

This gives constitutional protection to the accused person’s right to legal representation.

Article 21: Fair Trial

The Supreme Court has interpreted the right to fair trial as part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21.

A trial cannot be fair if the accused is denied legal assistance.

Article 14: Equality before Law

Article 14 ensures equality before law and equal protection of laws. Even an unpopular accused cannot be excluded from constitutional protection.

Article 39A: Equal Justice and Legal Aid

Article 39A directs the State to ensure that justice is not denied because of economic or other disabilities. It forms the basis of free legal aid in India.

Together, these provisions create the constitutional foundation for the right to legal representation.

Supreme Court’s Position

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that Bar Association resolutions refusing representation to an accused are invalid.

A.S. Mohammed Rafi v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2010

In this case, a Bar Association had resolved that its members would not represent police personnel accused after a conflict between lawyers and police in Coimbatore.

The Supreme Court held that such resolutions are:

  • Wholly illegal
  • Against professional ethics
  • Against constitutional values
  • Null and void

The Court made it clear that every accused, however disliked by society, has the right to be defended in a court of law.

It also stated that lawyers should ignore and defy such unlawful resolutions if they wish to uphold democracy and rule of law.

Bar Council of India Rules

The Bar Council of India Rules on professional conduct say that an advocate is generally bound to accept any brief in a court, tribunal or authority where he practises, provided the fee is consistent with his standing and the nature of the case.

The rules allow an advocate to refuse a brief only in special circumstances.

However, such refusal is an individual professional decision. It cannot be converted into a collective boycott by a Bar Association.

Can an Individual Advocate Refuse a Brief?

Yes, an individual advocate may refuse a case in special circumstances.

But a Bar Association cannot:

  • Threaten lawyers with fines
  • Remove membership
  • Socially boycott advocates
  • Prevent filing of bail applications
  • Obstruct access to court
  • Stop any advocate from appearing for an accused

The Uttarakhand High Court in Kuldeep Agarwal v. State of Uttarakhand, 2019 clarified that “special circumstances” apply to an individual advocate, not to a Bar Association as a collective body.

Previous Instances of Bar Boycott

Bar Associations have passed similar resolutions in several high-profile cases.

Ajmal Kasab Case

After the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, some lawyers opposed legal representation for Ajmal Kasab. Eventually, a lawyer was appointed under security, ensuring a fair trial.

Delhi Gangrape Case, 2012

Lawyers at Saket courts passed a resolution refusing to represent the accused.

Hyderabad Veterinary Doctor Case, 2019

Lawyers reportedly declined to represent the accused in the rape and murder case.

Gurugram School Murder Case, 2017

The Supreme Court directed that lawyers must not obstruct representation of the accused, emphasising that the right to counsel is essential for rule of law.

How Courts Have Responded

Courts have consistently rejected Bar Association boycotts.

Uttarakhand High Court, 2019

  • The Court declared a Bar Association resolution null and void when it threatened action against advocates representing an accused in the murder of an advocate.
  • It also directed the State Bar Council to act against such resolutions in future.

Karnataka High Court, 2020

  • The Court criticised lawyers who objected to advocates representing Kashmiri students accused of raising pro-Pakistan slogans. It described such obstruction as unacceptable and warned that it could amount to contempt.

Madras High Court, 2025

  • The Court reiterated that Bar Associations cannot formally or informally prevent advocates from appearing for an accused. It observed that the Bar is not a trade union but an institution of constitutional importance.

Why Legal Representation Matters

Protects Rule of Law

  • If lawyers refuse to defend accused persons based on public opinion, criminal justice becomes mob-driven rather than law-driven.

Ensures Fair Trial

  • A fair trial requires that both prosecution and defence are heard before an impartial court.

Protects Victims Too

  • Convictions based on proper trial and evidence are stronger and less vulnerable to appeal.

Preserves Professional Ethics

  • An advocate is not endorsing the alleged crime by defending an accused. The lawyer is helping the court test evidence and ensure due process.

Prevents Miscarriage of Justice

  • Without defence counsel, innocent persons may be wrongly convicted and guilty persons may escape due to procedural irregularities.

Conclusion

Bar Associations cannot legally refuse to represent an accused or prevent their members from doing so. Such resolutions violate Article 22(1), weaken the right to fair trial under Article 21, offend Article 14, and go against the professional duties of advocates under the Bar Council of India Rules.

The constitutional message is clear: every accused has the right to legal representation, and every trial must be conducted according to law, not public emotion.

CARE MCQ

Q. Consider the following statements regarding the right of an accused to legal representation:

  1. Article 22(1) protects the right of an arrested person to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner.
  2. The right to fair trial has been recognised as part of Article 21.
  3. Article 39A deals with equal justice and free legal aid.
  4. Article 14 permits denial of legal representation to unpopular accused persons.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1, 2 and 3 only
(c) 2, 3 and 4 only
(d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

Answer: (b)

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct: Article 22(1) protects the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner.

Statement 2 is correct: Fair trial is part of Article 21.

Statement 3 is correct: Article 39A deals with equal justice and free legal aid.

Statement 4 is incorrect: Article 14 ensures equality before law; it does not allow denial of representation.

FAQs

1. Can a Bar Association refuse to represent an accused?

No. A Bar Association cannot collectively stop lawyers from representing any accused person.

2. Which Article protects the accused’s right to a lawyer?

Article 22(1) gives an arrested person the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner.

3. Is legal representation part of fair trial?

Yes. The Supreme Court has held that fair trial is part of Article 21, the right to life and personal liberty.

4. What did the Supreme Court say?

In A.S. Mohammed Rafi v. State of Tamil Nadu (2010), the Supreme Court held that such Bar Association resolutions are illegal, unethical and null and void.

5. Can an individual lawyer refuse a case?

Yes, an individual advocate may refuse a case in special circumstances, but a Bar Association cannot impose a collective boycott.

6. Does defending an accused mean supporting the crime?

No. A lawyer only ensures due process, fair trial and rule of law.

UPSC Current Affairs July 8th 2026
UPSC Current Affairs July 6th 2026

Enroll Now for Unlimited UPSC Utsav

Start Date

22/03/2026

Timings

08 AM – 4 PM

    Courses

    Scroll to Top