Relevance: TSPSC – Telangana Specific (Polity, Federalism, Delimitation, Regional Balance)
For Prelims:
Delimitation, Article 81, Article 82, Freeze on Delimitation (1976–2026), GSDP (Gross State Domestic Product), 84th Constitutional Amendment
For Mains:
- Federalism in India, Regional Imbalance, Representation vs Population Debate, Delimitation Reform, Economic Criteria in Representation
Why in News?
- Revanth Reddy has proposed the inclusion of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) as a criterion in delimitation, arguing that population-based seat allocation alone would disadvantage southern States.
Background of the Issue
- The issue arises in the context of a possible increase in the strength of the Lok Sabha.
- Currently, seats in the Lok Sabha are allocated primarily based on population.
- However, States that have successfully controlled population growth may lose relative representation, creating concerns of regional imbalance.
Key Proposal
The Chief Minister has suggested a hybrid model of seat allocation:
- 50% of seats to be allocated based on population (pro-rata basis)
- 50% of seats to be allocated based on GSDP (economic contribution)
For example, out of 272 additional seats:
- 136 seats → population basis
- 136 seats → GSDP basis
The proposal aims to ensure that economically contributing States are not politically marginalised.
Delimitation Framework in India
Delimitation refers to the process of redrawing constituency boundaries and reallocating seats.
- Article 81 → Allocation of seats in Lok Sabha
- Article 82 → Readjustment after Census
The process is carried out by the Delimitation Commission, whose decisions are final and binding.
Historical Evolution
- The Delimitation Commission is a statutory, independent, and quasi-judicial body constituted by the Government of India to redraw the boundaries of Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assembly constituencies based on Census data.
- It ensures the principle of “one person, one vote, one value” by maintaining roughly equal population across constituencies.
- Delimitation exercises conducted in 1967 and 1976
- Constitutional Basis:
Article | Provision |
Article 82 | Parliament enacts a Delimitation Act after every Census |
Article 170 | Readjustment of State Assembly constituencies |
Articles 330 & 332 | Reservation of seats for SCs and STs |
Article 327 | Parliament’s power to legislate on elections |
Article 329(a) | Delimitation orders are non-justiciable |
- 42nd Amendment (1976) → Freeze on seat redistribution
- 84th Amendment (2001) → Extended freeze till post-2026 Census
Thus, the next delimitation exercise is expected after 2026.
Issue of Regional Imbalance
Population-based delimitation may increase the representation of northern States more than southern States.
For example:
- Uttar Pradesh → 80 seats → may increase to 120
- Kerala → 20 seats → may increase to 30
This widens the gap and may reduce the relative political influence of southern States
Significance of Proposal
The proposal introduces the idea of combining population with economic contribution in representation.
It attempts to address concerns of States that have achieved population control and contributed significantly to economic growth.
It highlights the need to balance democratic representation with federal fairness.
Challenges
- Constitutional framework currently based on population
- Resistance from States benefiting from current system
- Difficulty in determining appropriate weightage
- Political consensus required for reform
Way Forward
- Conduct all-party consultations and expert review
- Ensure balance between population and economic contribution
- Strengthen cooperative federalism through dialogue
- Develop a transparent and acceptable delimitation model
CARE MCQ
Q. With reference to the Delimitation Act, 2002, consider the following statements:
- The Act empowered the Delimitation Commission to determine the number of seats reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
- The Act froze the total number of seats in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies based on the 1971 Census.
- The Act required the Commission to consider geographical features, communication, and public convenience while delimiting constituencies.
- The orders of the Delimitation Commission are subject to judicial review.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) Only three
(d) All four
Ans: (c)
Explanation:
Statement 1 is correct: The Delimitation Act, 2002 empowered the Commission to readjust and determine the number of seats reserved for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) based on the 2001 Census, even though the total number of seats remained unchanged.
Statement 2 is correct: The total number of seats in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies was frozen based on the 1971 Census, as per the 42nd Amendment (1976), later extended by the 84th Amendment (2001) up to 2026. The 2002 Act operates within this constitutional freeze.
Statement 3 is correct: The Act mandates that delimitation must consider physical features, existing administrative boundaries, means of communication, and public convenience, ensuring balanced and practical constituency formation.
Statement 4 is incorrect: The orders of the Delimitation Commission, once finalized, have the force of law and cannot be challenged in any court, ensuring finality and preventing prolonged litigation in electoral matters.
Q. Regarding the Delimitation Commission in India, which of the following statements is correct?
(a) It is a constitutional body directly established under Article 82.
(b) It redraws state boundaries based on demographic factors.
(c) The 84th Constitutional Amendment extended the freeze on seat allocation till 2026.
(d) It deals only with Lok Sabha constituencies.
Ans: (c)
Explanation:
Option (a) is incorrect: The Delimitation Commission is not a constitutional body; it is established by an Act of Parliament, though Article 82 provides the constitutional basis for such legislation.
Option (b) is incorrect: The Commission does not alter state boundaries; its role is limited to redrawing electoral constituencies.
Option (c) is correct: The 84th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2001 extended the freeze on the total number of seats in Lok Sabha and State Assemblies till 2026, while allowing readjustment of constituency boundaries.
Option (d) is incorrect: The Commission is responsible for delimiting both Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assembly constituencies.
Q. Consider the following statements regarding delimitation in India:
- The first delimitation exercise was carried out by the President with the help of the Election Commission.
- The Delimitation Commission Act was first enacted in 1952.
- Article 200 provides for division of States into territorial constituencies.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All three
(d) None
Ans: (b)
Explanation:
Statement 1 is correct: The first delimitation exercise (1950–51) was conducted by the President with the assistance of the Election Commission, before a formal commission structure was institutionalized.
Statement 2 is correct: The Delimitation Commission Act was enacted in 1952, leading to the establishment of the first official Delimitation Commission.
Statement 3 is incorrect: The correct provision is Article 170, not Article 200. Article 170 deals with division of States into territorial constituencies for Legislative Assemblies. Article 200 relates to the Governor’s assent to bills.
CARE MAINS
Q. Discuss the role of the Delimitation Commission in ensuring democratic equality in India. How does it uphold the principle of “one person, one vote, one value”? (150/250 words)
FAQs
Q1. What is delimitation?
Delimitation is the process of redrawing constituency boundaries and reallocating seats in legislative bodies based on population changes.
Q2. Which Articles deal with delimitation?
Article 81 (seat allocation) and Article 82 (readjustment after Census).
Q3. Why is delimitation currently frozen?
To encourage population control and prevent States with higher population growth from gaining disproportionate political advantage.
Q4. What is GSDP?
Gross State Domestic Product is the total economic output of a State.
Q5. Why is GSDP being proposed as a criterion?
To ensure that States contributing more to the economy are not politically disadvantaged.
Relevance: GS Paper II – Polity & Governance
For Prelims:
Exchange rate, Currency depreciation, Balance of Payments (BoP), Current Account Deficit (CAD), Capital inflows, Impossible Trinity
For Mains:
- Currency credibility and macroeconomic signalling, external sector vulnerability, capital flight and investor sentiment, inflationary impact of depreciation, policy trade-offs in open economy, monetary–fiscal coordination
Why in News?
The article highlights that the Indian rupee should not be understood merely as a price of one currency in terms of another, but as a broader indicator of economic credibility. In the present context of Balance of Payments pressures, declining foreign capital inflows, and global uncertainty, the stability of the rupee reflects the confidence that investors, markets, and global institutions place in India’s macroeconomic management
Rupee Beyond Price: Conceptual Understanding
- The exchange rate of a currency performs a dual function. At a basic level, it determines the relative price of domestic goods and services in international markets.
- However, at a deeper level, it reflects the credibility of a country’s economic fundamentals, policy framework, and institutional stability
- A stable or appreciating currency generally signals that investors have confidence in the economy’s growth prospects, fiscal discipline, and monetary management.
- Conversely, persistent depreciation of the currency often indicates underlying weaknesses such as external imbalances, policy uncertainty, or declining investor confidence
- Therefore, the rupee acts as a “barometer of credibility,” because its movements capture both economic performance and perceptions about future stability.
Key Economic Theories Explaining Currency Behaviour
- Dornbusch’s Overshooting Model explains that exchange rates may react excessively in the short run due to differences in adjustment speeds between financial markets and goods markets.
- Financial markets adjust rapidly to policy changes, while prices of goods and wages remain sticky.
- As a result, when a central bank adopts an expansionary monetary policy, the currency may depreciate sharply beyond its long-run equilibrium level before gradually stabilising.
- This excessive short-term depreciation can trigger capital outflows and financial instability
- The Mundell-Fleming Model introduces the concept of the Impossible Trinity or policy trilemma.
- According to this framework, an open economy cannot simultaneously achieve three objectives: a fixed exchange rate, free movement of capital, and independent monetary policy.
- Policymakers must choose any two of these, sacrificing the third. This creates inherent policy constraints when managing exchange rates during periods of global volatility
Historical Evidence from Global and Indian Context
- During the Global Financial Crisis of 2008–09, India faced a slowdown due to global demand contraction and financial instability.
- The policy response included aggressive monetary easing through reduction in repo rates and reserve requirements, along with fiscal stimulus measures to boost demand.
- This helped stabilise growth and restore confidence
- During the Taper Tantrum of 2013, the announcement by the US Federal Reserve to reduce liquidity triggered capital outflows from emerging markets, including India.
- The rupee depreciated sharply during this period.
- The Reserve Bank of India responded by tightening short-term interest rates, providing foreign currency liquidity through oil-dollar swaps, and the government complemented this with measures such as raising gold import duties and reducing fiscal expenditure.
- These steps helped stabilise the currency and restore investor confidence
- These episodes demonstrate that currency stability depends not only on market forces but also on timely and credible policy interventions
Present Macroeconomic Situation (2026)
- In 2026, India is facing renewed pressure on the rupee due to a combination of external and domestic factors.
- The Balance of Payments situation has become challenging due to a mismatch between current account deficits and capital inflows.
- Even though the absolute level of the Current Account Deficit may not be very high, its financing has become difficult because of negative net inflows of Foreign Direct Investment and volatility in portfolio investments
- This situation highlights that currency stability depends not just on trade balances but also on sustained and stable capital inflows.
- Weak investor sentiment can amplify exchange rate pressures even in the presence of moderate macroeconomic indicators
Implications of Currency Depreciation
- Currency depreciation has both positive and negative consequences, but its net impact depends on the structure of the economy
- On the positive side, depreciation makes exports more competitive by lowering the relative price of domestic goods in global markets. This can potentially boost export growth and support domestic production
- However, the negative effects are often more immediate and severe.
- Depreciation increases the cost of imports, particularly essential commodities such as crude oil, leading to imported inflation.
- It also raises the burden of servicing external debt, as liabilities denominated in foreign currency become more expensive in domestic terms.
- Additionally, it reduces the purchasing power of households and can erode investor confidence if depreciation is perceived as a sign of macroeconomic instability
- Thus, relying on a weaker currency as a tool for growth can be counterproductive in the long run.
Policy Constraints and Structural Challenges
- Monetary policy has limited effectiveness in managing currency depreciation during supply-side shocks.
- Raising interest rates to defend the currency can slow down economic growth and reduce investment
- India’s dependence on volatile capital flows, particularly Foreign Portfolio Investment, increases vulnerability to global financial shocks. Sudden reversals of these flows can lead to sharp currency depreciation
- There are also structural challenges related to export competitiveness, fiscal deficits, and policy predictability.
- If investors perceive uncertainty in regulatory or policy frameworks, it can lead to capital flight and further pressure on the currency
Way Forward
- Strengthening macroeconomic fundamentals through fiscal discipline, controlled inflation, and sustainable growth is essential to maintaining currency stability
- Improving the ease of doing business and ensuring policy consistency can help retain long-term investors and attract stable capital inflows
- Diversifying sources of capital inflows, including encouraging long-term FDI over volatile portfolio investments, can reduce external vulnerability
- Enhancing export competitiveness through productivity improvements, infrastructure development, and technological upgrading is more sustainable than relying on currency depreciation
- Ensuring coordinated action between monetary and fiscal authorities can help manage external shocks more effectively
Conclusion
The rupee is not merely an exchange rate variable but a reflection of economic credibility, policy strength, and institutional trust. While short-term fluctuations are inevitable in an open economy, long-term stability of the currency depends on strong fundamentals and credible policy frameworks. Sustainable economic growth is driven not by deliberate currency weakening but by stability, confidence, and structural resilience
CARE MCQ
Q. With reference to exchange rate dynamics, consider the following statements
- Currency depreciation always leads to higher economic growth
- Depreciation increases the burden of foreign currency-denominated debt
- A country can simultaneously maintain fixed exchange rate, free capital mobility, and independent monetary policy
Which of the statements given above are correct
A. 2 only
B. 1 and 2 only
C. 2 and 3 only
D. 1, 2 and 3
Answer A
Explanation
Statement 1 is incorrect because depreciation can lead to inflation and financial instability, offsetting export gains
Statement 2 is correct because depreciation increases the domestic cost of servicing foreign debt
Statement 3 is incorrect because the Impossible Trinity states that all three objectives cannot be achieved simultaneously.
Q. With reference to exchange rate management in India, consider the impact of RBI’s intervention in the foreign exchange market:
When the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) purchases foreign currency to stabilize the value of the Rupee, what is its primary effect on domestic liquidity?
(a) It leads to a contraction in domestic money supply
(b) It leads to an expansion in domestic money supply
(c) It remains neutral due to simultaneous Open Market Operations
(d) It automatically increases the Repo rate
Ans: (b)
Explanation:
When the RBI purchases foreign currency (e.g., dollars) from the market, it pays for these assets by injecting equivalent rupees into the banking system. This increases the reserves of commercial banks and enhances overall liquidity in the economy, making the impact expansionary.
This is a key mechanism of exchange rate management, especially when the RBI aims to prevent excessive appreciation of the Rupee due to large capital inflows.
Although the RBI may later conduct sterilization operations (such as selling government securities) to absorb excess liquidity, the immediate and primary effect of forex purchase is an increase in money supply.
Q. Consider the following statements regarding the dynamics of the Indian Rupee in the foreign exchange market:
Statement I: An increase in Net Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows exerts downward pressure on the value of the Indian Rupee.
Statement II: The ‘Impossible Trinity’ (Mundell-Fleming Trilemma) states that a country cannot simultaneously maintain a fixed exchange rate, free capital movement, and independent monetary policy.
Which one of the following is correct?
(a) Both Statement I and II are correct and II explains I
(b) Both Statement I and II are correct but II does not explain I
(c) Statement I is correct but II is incorrect
(d) Statement I is incorrect but II is correct
Ans: (d)
Explanation:
Statement I is incorrect: An increase in FDI inflows leads to a higher supply of foreign currency (like dollars) in the domestic market. This increases demand for the Rupee, thereby causing appreciation (upward pressure), not depreciation. The confusion often arises due to misunderstanding between nominal exchange rate and REER, making this a classic conceptual trap.
Statement II is correct: The Impossible Trinity (Mundell-Fleming Trilemma) is a foundational concept in international economics. It states that a country cannot simultaneously achieve:
- Fixed exchange rate
- Free capital mobility
- Independent monetary policy
A country must sacrifice one of these three objectives. India, for example, follows a managed float exchange rate, allowing some degree of monetary independence while partially managing capital flows.
Q. Consider the following statements regarding the monetary reforms and evolution of the Indian Rupee during the colonial period:
Statement 1: The ‘Gold Exchange Standard’ adopted in 1898 pegged the Indian Rupee to the British Pound Sterling at approximately 15 rupees to one pound.
Statement 2: This exchange rate arrangement was aimed at facilitating the payment of ‘Home Charges’ by ensuring stability of the rupee against sterling.
Which one of the following is correct?
(a) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct and Statement 2 is the correct explanation for Statement 1
(b) Both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are correct but Statement 2 is not the correct explanation for Statement 1
(c) Statement 1 is correct but Statement 2 is incorrect
(d) Statement 1 is incorrect but Statement 2 is correct
Ans: (a)
Explanation:
Statement 1 is correct: Following the recommendations of the Fowler Committee (1898), India adopted the Gold Exchange Standard, under which the rupee—though not directly convertible into gold domestically—was pegged to gold via the British Pound Sterling. The fixed rate of 1 shilling 4 pence per rupee (i.e., 15 rupees per pound) provided exchange rate stability and marked a shift from the earlier silver-based currency system, which had become volatile due to falling silver prices.
Statement 2 is correct: The primary motivation behind this monetary arrangement was to facilitate the smooth payment of ‘Home Charges’—a substantial financial burden on colonial India. These included payments such as:
- Salaries and pensions of British officials
- Interest on public debt held in Britain
- Administrative and military expenses incurred in London
Since these obligations had to be paid in Pound Sterling, exchange rate stability became essential. A volatile rupee (under the silver standard) would have made these payments unpredictable and costly.
Link between Statement 1 and Statement 2:
Statement 2 correctly explains Statement 1. The pegging of the rupee to sterling under the Gold Exchange Standard was fundamentally driven by imperial financial interests, particularly the need to ensure predictable and stable remittances to Britain.
FAQs
Q1 Why is the rupee considered a barometer of credibility?
Because it reflects investor confidence, macroeconomic stability, and the effectiveness of economic policies
Q2 What is the biggest risk associated with currency depreciation?
The most significant risks are imported inflation, increased external debt burden, and erosion of investor confidence
Q3 What is the Impossible Trinity in economics?
It is the principle that an open economy cannot simultaneously maintain fixed exchange rates, free capital movement, and independent monetary policy
Q4 Why are capital flows important for currency stability?
Capital inflows help finance current account deficits and support the value of the currency
Q5 Is a weaker currency always beneficial for exports?
While it can improve export competitiveness, the overall impact depends on inflation, import costs, and investor confidence
Relevance: GS Paper II – Polity, Social Justice
For Prelims:
Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, Article 341, Scheduled Castes, Presidential Notification, Commission of Inquiry
For Mains:
- Substantive equality vs formal equality, caste versus religion debate, affirmative action framework, constitutional morality, social justice jurisprudence, minority rights and reservation policy
Why in News
The Union Government has granted a third extension to the Commission of Inquiry headed by former Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan, extending its tenure till June 2026. The Commission is examining whether Scheduled Caste status should be extended to Dalits who have converted to religions such as Christianity and Islam. The issue has gained prominence due to an ongoing constitutional challenge and judicial scrutiny regarding the validity of the current legal framework.
Background of the Issue
- The concept of Scheduled Castes is historically linked to communities subjected to untouchability and systemic social discrimination within the Hindu social order.
- Over time, similar groups within Sikhism and Buddhism were also recognised as Scheduled Castes through legislative amendments
- However, individuals who convert to Christianity or Islam are currently excluded from Scheduled Caste status, even if they continue to face caste-based discrimination in practice. This has led to long-standing demands from Dalit Christians and Dalit Muslims for inclusion in the Scheduled Caste category
Constitutional Framework
Article 341 of the Constitution of India empowers the President to specify which castes shall be recognised as Scheduled Castes for a particular State or Union Territory
The key constitutional features include
- The President issues the initial list through a notification after consulting the Governor of the State
- Parliament has exclusive authority to include or exclude any caste from this list
The list is State-specific and cannot be modified by executive action alone - This framework establishes that Scheduled Caste status is a constitutional category subject to both executive notification and parliamentary control
1950 Presidential Order and Religious Restriction
The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 originally restricted Scheduled Caste status only to Hindus
Subsequent amendments expanded the scope
In 1956, Sikhs were included
In 1990, Buddhists were included
- However, the Order continues to exclude persons professing Christianity and Islam
- This religious restriction forms the core of the present controversy, as it links caste-based benefits with religious identity rather than social disadvantage alone
Balakrishnan Commission: Role and Mandate
The Commission of Inquiry was constituted in October 2022 to examine the issue of granting Scheduled Caste status to Dalits who have converted to other religions
Its mandate includes
- Studying whether caste-based discrimination persists after religious conversion
- Evaluating the constitutional, legal, and social implications of extending SC status
Recommending policy changes, if required - The repeated extensions indicate the complexity and sensitivity of the issue, involving constitutional interpretation, social realities, and political considerations
Judicial Dimension
The Supreme Court is currently examining petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the 1950 Order
Arguments presented include
- Petitioners argue that exclusion of Dalit Christians and Muslims violates fundamental rights such as equality and freedom of religion
- The opposing view holds that Scheduled Caste status is historically linked to Hindu social structure and cannot be extended beyond its original context
- The Court’s eventual ruling will have far-reaching implications for reservation policy and constitutional interpretation
Core Debate: Caste vs Religion
- The central issue revolves around whether caste-based discrimination is purely a religious phenomenon or a broader social reality
- One perspective argues that caste is intrinsic to Hindu social structure, and therefore SC status should remain restricted
- Another perspective highlights that caste-based discrimination continues even after conversion, indicating that social identity does not change merely through religious transformation
- This creates a tension between formal classification based on religion and substantive equality based on actual social disadvantage
Implications of Inclusion or Exclusion
- If inclusion is allowed
It would extend affirmative action benefits to a larger group facing social discrimination
It may strengthen the principle of substantive equality
It could also lead to demands for expansion of reservation quotas
- If exclusion continues
It may perpetuate inequality among similarly placed groups
It raises questions about the consistency of secularism and equal protection
It may continue to exclude disadvantaged community from welfare benefit.
Challenges
- Establishing empirical evidence regarding persistence of caste discrimination after conversion
- Balancing constitutional principles of equality, secularism, and affirmative action
- Managing political and social sensitivities associated with reservation policies
- Avoiding excessive expansion of reservation categories that may dilute existing benefits
Way Forward
- A data-driven approach should be adopted to assess the extent of caste-based discrimination across religions
- The focus should shift from religion-based classification to socio-economic and historical disadvantage
- Parliament may consider revisiting the 1950 Order to align it with contemporary realities and constitutional principles
- Judicial clarity is essential to resolve the conflict between formal equality and substantive justice
Conclusion
The debate over extending Scheduled Caste status to Dalits post-conversion reflects a deeper constitutional question regarding the nature of equality and social justice in India. While the existing framework links SC status with religion, evolving social realities challenge this approach. A balanced resolution requires harmonising constitutional principles with ground realities to ensure that affirmative action truly benefits those who continue to face systemic discrimination
CARE MCQ
Q. With reference to Scheduled Castes in India, consider the following statements
- The President can modify the list of Scheduled Castes at any time by notification
- Scheduled Caste status is currently restricted to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists
- Parliament has the power to include or exclude communities from the SC list
Which of the statements given above are correct
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 2 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
Ans: (a)
Explanation:
Statement 1 is incorrect because once notified, the SC list can only be modified by Parliament and not by the President alone
Statement 2 is correct because the 1950 Order restricts SC status to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists
Statement 3 is correct because Parliament has exclusive authority to amend the list.
Q.With reference to the constitutional status of Scheduled Castes (Dalits) in India, which of the following statements is correct?
(a) The Constitution provides reservation for Scheduled Castes in both public employment and private sector employment.
(b) The President can notify Scheduled Castes for a State, subject to modification only by Parliament.
(c) The status of Scheduled Castes is determined solely by the State Governments.
(d) Scheduled Castes are entitled to reservation only in educational institutions and not in legislatures.
Ans: (b)
Explanation:
Article 341 of the Constitution empowers the President to specify the list of Scheduled Castes for each State or Union Territory, in consultation with the Governor. Once notified, this list can only be modified by Parliament through law, not by executive action.
The other options are incorrect because reservation does not extend to the private sector, the State Governments do not have final authority in determining SC status, and Scheduled Castes are also provided political reservation in legislatures under Articles 330 and 332.
Q.With reference to political representation of Scheduled Castes, consider the following:
(a) Reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes in Lok Sabha is based on their proportion in total population of India.
(b) Reservation for Scheduled Castes in State Assemblies is fixed permanently by the Constitution.
(c) The reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes in legislatures is subject to periodic extension by constitutional amendments.
(d) Scheduled Castes have reservation only in local bodies, not in Parliament.
Ans: (c)
Explanation:
Reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes in legislatures was initially for 10 years but has been extended periodically through constitutional amendments (latest extension up to 2030). It is not permanent, making this a key conceptual point.
FAQs
Q1 Why are Dalit Christians and Muslims excluded from SC status?
Because the 1950 Presidential Order links SC status to specific religions and excludes others
Q2 What is the role of Article 341?
It empowers the President to specify Scheduled Castes and Parliament to modify the list
Q3 What is the main argument for inclusion?
That caste-based discrimination persists even after conversion and should be recognised
Q4 What is the main concern against inclusion?
That SC status is historically tied to Hindu social structure and expanding it may alter reservation dynamics
Q5 Why is this issue important for UPSC?
It involves constitutional law, social justice, minority rights, and affirmative action policy
