CHANGING INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ORDER
1. CHANGING INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ORDER
7a. Rise of Superpowers; Bipolarity; Cold War; Arms Race; Nuclear Threat
- Comment: Pax Americana. (1991)
- The new world order as conceived by USA is an effort to re-establish the American century in military terms as the American economic and industrial dominance of the last 50 years is lost. Comment. (1993)
- Assess the role of the rim countries of the Indian Ocean in taking it a peace zone in the post-Cold War era. (1998)
- Do you think Cold War still exists after the disintegration of the Soviet Union? (2003)
- How would you differentiate the post-Cold War global order from its predecessor? (2007)
- Explain how far Deutsch’s model explains the framework of international interdependence. Do you think that the processes of interdependence and integration have grown steadily in the post-Cold War globalization trajectory? (2009)
- Identify the major changes in the International Political Economy in post-Cold War period. (200 words) (2013)
- What does the pace of nuclear proliferation in post-Cold War suggest? (150 words) (2013)
- Discuss the evolution of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons in the post-Cold War Period. (2016)
- Examine in brief the rise and fall of the Cold War. (2016)
- “The development of advanced missile Gulf War technology and nuclear threat by North Korea has challenged the American hegemony in South-East Asia.” Evaluate the above statement in the context of recent developments in the region. (2017)
- Discuss the consequences of Trump’s “America First” and Xi’s “Chinese Dream” on World Politics. (2018)
- Critically analyze the implications of Sino–American strategic rivalry for the South and South-East Asian region. (2020)
Cuban Missile Crisis
- Comment: Cuban Missile as a factor in U.S. relationship with the U.S.S.R. (2001)
- Analyse critically the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 as an instance of superpower relations during the Cold War period. (2004)
Oil Crisis
- Comment: Oil crisis: Its impact on India’s development strategy. (2006)
Afghan Civil War
- Critically examine the roots of Afghan Civil War. What role the Soviet Union and the United States played in it? (2002)
- “The Afghan Civil War gave the US a long-awaited upper hand in South Asia.” Elaborate. (2007)
Gulf War
- Comment: Iraq after the Gulf War. (1992)
- Comment: The Gulf Crisis 1991-92. (1999)
7b. Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Aims and Achievements
- Comment: NAM in the post-Cold War era. (1993)
- Comment: Agenda before NAM. (1995)
- “The change in the position of the people of Asia and Africa and their relations with Europe was the surest sign of the advent of a new era.” Discuss. (1997)
- “In a uni-polar world, non-alignment has lost its relevance.” Do you agree with this view? Give arguments in support of your answer. (1999)
- Do you agree with the stand that the Non-Aligned Movement needs to be reinvented? (2000)
- Comment: Relevance of Non-Alignment in Post-Cold war era. (2005)
- Bring out your perspective on plausible aims of the Non-Aligned Movement in the post-Cold War period. (2010)
- Do you think that Iran’s ‘victory’ in the NAM on the nuclear issue has brought in a new debate on the relevance of the Non-Aligned Movement? (250 words) (2012)
- Highlight the major features of Non-alignment 2.0 document. (200 words) (2013)
- Do you endorse the view that the end of Bipolarity and the rise of multiple regional organisations has made Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) more or less irrelevant? (2017)
- Discuss the significance of Non-Aligned Movement as a unique contribution of the Non-Western world to World Politics. (2018)
- Write a brief note on the 17th NAM Summit in Venezuela. (2019)
- Discuss the ways to strengthen the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) to enable it to address the challenges faced by the developing countries. (2020)
- Discuss the relevance of the normative ethos of the Non-Aligned Movement in magnifying India’s soft power in pursuit of her national interest. (2023)
- “During the Cold War, the Non-Aligned Movement tried to become a ‘Third Force’ in world politics, but failed because it was too large and unwieldy.” Discuss. (2023)
7c. Collapse of the Soviet Union; Unipolarity & American Hegemony; Relevance of NAM in Contemporary World
- Comment: Perestroika. (1991)
- Comment: Disintegration of the Soviet Union and the threat of nuclear proliferation. (1992)
- Comment: Impact of the collapse of the Soviet Union on international politics. (2004)
- Identify the challenges to American hegemony in post-Soviet world. (150 words) (2013)
- Discuss the collapse of the Soviet Union and its impact on international politics. (2015)
- Discuss the positive and negative impacts of Soviet Union’s disintegration on developing nations. (2016)
- Critically examine the decline of the United States of America as a hegemon and its implications for the changing international political order. (2021)
- Critically examine the rise of People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a great power and its implications on Asian Political order. (2022)
- Discuss the various constraints on American hegemony today. Which of these are likely to become more prominent in the future? (2023)
- The expansionist tendencies of the current Russian regime indicate its intentions for the realisation of a Greater Russia on the lines of the Soviet era. Comment. (2024)
- Do you agree with the view that the USA uses NATO as a traditional tool of strategy to perpetuate its hegemony in the world? (2024)
Major Issues of World Politics: Miscellaneous
- Comment: Racialism in South Africa. (1991)
- Comment: China’s Middle Kingdom Complex. (1992)
- Discuss the prospects of peace in West Asia in view of the changes in the US and Israeli policy and attitudes in this regard. (1992)
- Nation-State is currently exposed to disintegrative tendencies from within and integrative tendencies from without. Elucidate the statement in the context of developments in Europe. (1993)
- Comment: Palestinian Homeland issue and the West Asian crisis. (1993)
- Comment: Peace in West Asia. (1994)
- Comment: Hamas and peace in West Asia. (1996)
- Comment: Palestine-Israel conflict in the present context. (1998)
- Examine the Israel-Arab conflict as a conflict of interest between the U.S.A. and the Soviet Union. (2000)
- The Arab-Israeli conflict is basically a conflict between two resurgent nationalisms. Do you agree with the above assertion? Give reasons in support of your answer. (2001)
- The growth and possession of WMD has seriously undermined international security. Discuss. (2008)
- “Ukraine crisis is a product of power politics and geo-politics.” Comment. (2014)
- The changing global order and ongoing regional conflicts, with the global powers taking sides, have jeopardised the progress made towards disarmament in the past. Comment. (2024)