Examine the key provisions of Article 293 of the Indian Constitution concerning State Governments’ borrowing powers.(13-01-2024)

Topic- Article 293
Introduction Article 293 delineates the borrowing powers of State Governments, emphasizing the need for central consent under specific circumstances.
Body Article 293:

·         State borrows within India.

·         Limits set by state legislature.

·         Consent required from Government of India.

·         Govt. of India can give loans.

Centralized Control:

·         Fiscal transfers breed moral hazard.

·         Populist fiscal tactics may be rewarded.

·         Dependency on transfers weakens budget constraints.

·         Past debt crises highlight regulatory need.

Against Centralized Control:

·         Independent institutions are vital.

·         Borrowing regulations can’t replace fiscal relations.

·         Sound fiscal relations need clear federal design.

Recommended Criteria/Conditions:

·         Modify consent mechanism gradually.

·         Introduce deficit range.

·         Incentivize credit ratings.

·         Ensure surplus cash utilization.

·         Impose transparent reporting rules.

Conclusion While centralized control addresses fiscal risks, striking a balance with fiscal autonomy is essential for responsible governance.

 

 

UPSC Syllabus  Issues and Challenges Pertaining to the Federal Structure
Why was this question asked? How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer. (2020)
Introduction Article 293 delineates the borrowing powers of State Governments, emphasizing the need for central consent under specific circumstances.
Body Article 293

·         State’s executive power extends to borrowing within India’s territory on Consolidated Fund security.

·         Limits set by state legislature; guarantees permitted within specified limits.

·         Consent required from Government of India if existing loan outstanding; Consent may have conditions.

·         Government of India can give loans, subject to Parliament-laid conditions; Charges on Consolidated Fund.

For Centralized Control:

·         Fiscal transfers breed moral hazard, encouraging subnational governments to shift excessive spending risks upwards.

·         Populist fiscal tactics may be rewarded, discouraging responsibility at the subnational level.

·         Dependency on intergovernmental transfers can weaken budget constraints, motivating subnational governments to control deficits.

·         Past subnational debt crises in decentralization highlight the need for effective regulatory frameworks.

Against Centralized Control:

  • Independent institutions for fiscal discipline are vital; central control may lead to suboptimal decisions.
  • Borrowing regulations alone cannot replace intergovernmental fiscal relations; Fiscal autonomy is crucial.
  • Sound fiscal relations require well-designed federal relations; clear function definition is essential.

Recommended Criteria/Conditions:

·         Gradual modification of the consent mechanism for greater flexibility.

·         Introduction of deficit range instead of a ceiling.

·         Incentivizing credit ratings for SDLs and investments in the CSF and GRF.

·         Conditions to ensure surplus unused cash balances are utilized.

·         Imposing transparent and compliance-oriented reporting rules.

Conclusion While centralized control addresses fiscal risks, striking a balance with fiscal autonomy is essential for responsible governance.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top