India’s stand in Hamas – Israel Conflict in the UNGA
|
Context |
On October 27th India was absent from a UN General Assembly vote on a resolution that called for an immediate humanitarian truce in the Israel-Hamas conflict. |
|
Reason for abstain |
- The resolution did not include “explicit condemnation” of the October 7 terror attacks in Israel.
- India clearly condemns terrorism. The resolution did not include the word – Hamas and hostage. Hence India abstained.
|
|
Title of the resolution |
- The “Protection of civilians and upholding legal and humanitarian obligations”
|
|
Who proposed the resolution |
- Jordan on behalf of 22 nations of Arab League and co-sponsored by nearly 40 countries
|
|
What is the outcome of the resolution |
- Date of passage of the resolution: 27th October 2023.
- Voted in favour: 120 countries
- Voted against: 14 including the U.S, Israel, five small Pacific island nations, and four Eastern European countries — Austria, Croatia, Czechia, and Hungary
- Abstentions: 45 including India, Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan and Ukraine
- French stand: France objected to the omission of references to the October 7 attacks as well as the hostages taken, but in a break from its western allies, voted for the resolution
- Co-sponsors of the resolution: Bangladesh, Maldives, Pakistan, Russia, and South Africa.
|
|
What was the content of resolution |
- It condemned “all acts of violence aimed at Palestinian and Israeli civilians, including all acts of terrorism and indiscriminate attacks, as well as all acts of provocation, incitement and destruction”.
|
|
There is no specific reference of Hamas’ attack |
- The resolution did not specifically refer to the terror attacks by Hamas on 7th October.
|
|
Amendment proposed to the resolution |
- Who proposed the amendment: Proposed by Canada and co-sponsored by the US
- What was the proposed amendment: Fix the responsibility of Hamas in the crisis.
- Voting on amendment: A majority (87) of approved the amendment (Including India)
- Voted Against amendment: 55 member states
- Abstained from voting: 23 countries.
Why the amendment failed despite majority?
- It has failed to get 2/3rd majority.
- So the amendment could not be adopted.
|
|
Hamas attack |
- Hamas carried terror attacks on 7th October 2023, that left more than 1,400 Israelis dead and 229 taken hostage.
|
|
Retaliatory strikes by Israeli Defence forces |
- 7,700 Palestinians have been killed, around half of which are children.
|
|
Impact of the resolution |
- UNGA resolutions are not binding. Therefore, despite the comprehensive defeat, Israel and the US are not obliged to act on the resolution.
Note: The resolutions of the UN Security Council are legally binding. But UNGA are not legally binding. |
What is India’s Stand
Expressed by
India’s Deputy Permanent Representative Yojana Patel |
- India had called for condemnation of the attacks and for the immediate and unconditional release of hostages.
- Terrorism is a malignancy and knows no borders, nationality, or race. The world should not buy into any justification of terror acts
|
|
What is the implication of the India’s stand |
- India adopted a balanced position
- It is in line with the one that it has maintained in the Russia-Ukraine war.
- This is the consensus-building exercise at the G20 Summit as well.
|
|
What are the next steps |
- Hamas has to unconditionally releases the Israeli hostages
- Soon after the release of hostages, Israel has to announce the ceasefire under the UNSC supervision.
- Meanwhile speeding up the deescalating efforts.
- All stakeholders – including Israel, Iran, as well as groups like Hezbollah — have to exercise restraint and responsibility.
- In the long run, continuing the consensus on two nation theory
- The consensus should help leading to the establishment of a sovereign, independent and viable State of Palestine living within secure and recognized borders, side-by-side in peace with Israel.
|
|
Way forward |
Given the complicated geopolitics of the Middle east, India will need to mobilise all its diplomatic skills and goodwill with the main actors to negotiate. |
|
|
|