Daily APPSC Current Affairs March 30 2026 Summary

Relevance: Group I &II – Prelims – facts; Group I – Mains, Paper IV – Indian Economy (Inclusive Growth, MSMEs, Digital Economy, Handloom Sector Development)

Important Keywords for Prelims and Mains

For Prelims:

  • APCO, SKOCH Award, Handloom Sector, Digitisation, E-commerce Platforms, Computerised Billing

For Mains:

  • Digital Transformation, MSME Sector, Handloom Industry, Market Access, Livelihood Promotion, Inclusive Growth

Why in News?

The Andhra Pradesh State Handloom Weavers Co-operative Society Ltd. (APCO) received the SKOCH Award–2025 for its digitisation initiatives in the handloom sector, recognising efforts to modernise traditional industries and improve weavers’ livelihoods.

Background

  • APCO is a state-level cooperative organisation working for the promotion of handloom products and welfare of weavers.
  • The award highlights the increasing importance of digital integration in traditional sectors like handlooms.

Key Highlights

1. Recognition for Digital Initiatives

  • APCO was awarded the SKOCH Award–2025.
  • The award was presented at the SKOCH Summit in New Delhi.
  • It was received by G. Rekha Rani, Commissioner (Handlooms and Textiles) and Vice-Chairperson & Managing Director of APCO.

2. Digitisation Measures Implemented

a) Computerised Billing Systems

  • Introduced across APCO outlets.
  • Helped in:
    • Improving transaction transparency
    • Reducing manual errors
    • Enhancing operational efficiency

b) E-commerce Platforms

  • Enabled online sale of handloom products.
  • Benefits:
    • Wider market reach beyond physical stores
    • Increased visibility of traditional products
    • Improved sales performance

3. Impact on Handloom Sector

Operational Efficiency

  • Streamlined processes through digital systems
  • Faster billing and inventory management

Market Expansion

  • Access to national and global consumers
  • Reduced dependency on local markets

Weavers’ Livelihood

  • Better income opportunities
  • Increased demand for handloom products

4. Alignment with Government Vision

  • Supports digital transformation of MSMEs
  • Promotes sustainable growth of the handloom sector
  • Enhances income security for traditional artisans

Significance

1. Strengthening Traditional Industries

  • Helps preserve cultural heritage while modernising operations

2. Inclusive Economic Growth

  • Integrates rural artisans into the digital economy

3. Digital India Objectives

  • Aligns with broader goals of digitisation and e-commerce expansion

Challenges

  • Limited digital literacy among weavers
  • Infrastructure gaps in rural areas
  • Need for continuous training and capacity building

Way Forward

  • Expand digital platforms for all handloom clusters
  • Provide skill training in digital tools for weavers
  • Strengthen logistics and supply chains for online sales
  • Promote branding and GI-tagged handloom products

Conclusion

The recognition of APCO through the SKOCH Award underscores the transformative potential of digitisation in traditional sectors. By combining technology with heritage industries, Andhra Pradesh has demonstrated a model for inclusive growth, improved livelihoods, and sustainable development in the handloom sector.

CARE MCQ

Q. Andhra Pradesh State Handloom Weavers Co-operative Society Ltd. (APCO) received the SKOCH Award–2025 primarily for:

(a) Expanding cotton cultivation in Andhra Pradesh
(b) Exporting handloom products to global markets
(c) Digitisation initiatives such as computerised billing and e-commerce platforms
(d) Establishing textile manufacturing units in rural areas

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

APCO was recognised for its digitisation initiatives, including:

  • Introduction of computerised billing systems for transparency and efficiency
  • Adoption of e-commerce platforms to expand market access

These measures improved operational efficiency and increased visibility of handloom products.

Relevance: GS Paper III – Science and Technology, Space Technology, Achievements of Astronauts in Science & Technology

Important Keywords for Prelims and Mains

For Prelims:

  • Artemis II, Artemis Programme, Orion Spacecraft, Apollo Programme, International Space Station (ISS), Artemis Accords, NISAR, Lunar Base, Nuclear Propulsion, Chang’e Project

For Mains:

  • Human Space Exploration, Lunar Base, Deep Space Exploration, International Space Cooperation, Role of Private Sector in Space, India’s Lunar Ambitions, Strategic Importance of Moon Missions

Why in News?

NASA is preparing for the Artemis II mission, which will take four astronauts around the Moon and mark the return of humans to the lunar vicinity after more than 50 years. At the same time, NASA has unveiled a broader roadmap for lunar exploration over the next decade, with the objective of laying the foundation for a permanent human base on the Moon.

The central idea behind the renewed lunar push is that this phase of Moon exploration is fundamentally different from the Apollo era. As NASA has stated, the aim is not merely symbolic presence, but sustained habitation and long-term use of the Moon as a stepping stone for deeper space exploration.

Background: From Apollo to Artemis

The Apollo programme achieved the first human landing on the Moon in 1969, and between 1969 and 197212 astronauts walked on the lunar surface across six successful Apollo missions. However, despite this technological breakthrough, the Moon landings did not evolve into a sustained human presence because the broader space technology ecosystem of that period was still limited.

When lunar exploration restarted in the early 2000s, countries did not resume from the point where Apollo ended. Instead, they began again with orbiters and robotic missions. This new phase has advanced incrementally, and the current round of planned human missions is being designed not as one-time events, but as part of a long-term habitation and exploration strategy.

What is Artemis II?

Artemis II

Artemis II is the second mission under NASA’s Artemis programme.

Key Features

  • It will carry four astronauts:
    • Reid Wiseman
    • Victor Glover
    • Christina Koch
    • Jeremy Hansen (Canadian Space Agency)
  • It will use the Orion spacecraft
  • It will take astronauts around the Moon and back, without landing
  • It will become the first crewed mission to fly past the Moon in more than five decades
undefined
Orion space craft
Apollo Mission (1969): NASA

Apollo Mission (1969): NASA

Orion space craft

Scientific Purpose

During the mission, the crew will:

  • Travel farther from Earth than any humans since the Apollo era
  • Observe the far side of the Moon
  • Study and image impact craters, ancient lava plains, and geological formations
  • Support training and data collection necessary for future missions to the lunar South Pole

Thus, Artemis II is essentially a crewed test mission aimed at validating systems and preparing for future landings.

NASA’s Long-Term Lunar Roadmap

NASA’s long-term goal is to begin establishing a permanent base on the Moon within the next few years.

Key Elements of the Roadmap

  • Create a system of frequent and repeated Moon missions
  • Build a facility capable of supporting long-term astronaut stays
  • Send:
    • humans
    • robots
    • fuel
    • logistics
    • scientific and habitat equipment
  • Use locally available lunar resources to support long-duration habitation

NASA is targeting a Moon landing, crewed or uncrewed, at least once every six months.

Artemis Timeline

  • Artemis I (2022): Uncrewed Orion mission around the Moon
  • Artemis II (2026): Crewed flyby around the Moon
  • Another test flight planned next year
  • Planned Moon landing by 2028
  • Artemis-3 likely in 2027–28
  • Artemis-4 and 5 likely in 2028–29 and 2030

The Moon is thus being conceived as a habitable outpost, not merely a destination.

Why the Moon Matters Again

NASA has addressed the common question: why return to the Moon when humans already went there over 50 years ago?

The New Logic of Lunar Exploration

This time, the Moon is not the final goal but a platform for deeper space missions.

The Moon can serve as:

  • A site for permanent human presence
  • A laboratory for testing systems needed for Mars missions
  • A launchpad for deeper space exploration
  • A place to develop technologies for survival beyond Earth

Thus, the Moon is strategically important because it helps humanity learn how to live, work, and operate sustainably in outer space.

Moon Base and ISS

NASA’s proposed lunar set-up resembles the model used in the International Space Station (ISS).

Similarities with ISS

  • Regular missions carrying crew and logistics
  • Continuous or frequent astronaut presence
  • Ongoing experiments
  • Multi-partner and modular approach

Why ISS Matters in this Context

The ISS, located about 400 km from Earth, has remained continuously manned for around 25 years and has played a major role in:

  • advancing knowledge of outer space
  • understanding human adaptation to space
  • testing life-support and operational systems

The Moon is about 400,000 km away, making operations much harder, but the ISS experience offers a working model for sustained extraterrestrial presence.

Transition Beyond ISS

The ISS is expected to retire in the next three to four years.

What Happens Next?

  • It may be replaced by multiple space stations
  • These may be developed by:
    • private players
    • countries such as China and India

NASA has indicated that it will not build a direct replacement of its own in low-Earth orbit, but will maintain its presence there through industrial and international partners.

This reflects a wider shift in space exploration from purely state-led models to hybrid public-private and international frameworks.

Nuclear Propulsion and Deep Space Plans

NASA has also announced plans to use nuclear energy for propulsion.

Space Reactor-1 Freedom Mission

  • Planned for Mars in 2028
  • Intended to be the first nuclear-powered interplanetary spacecraft

Significance

Nuclear energy can:

  • increase mission efficiency
  • support longer-duration travel
  • reduce time and energy costs in deep space missions

This shows that NASA’s Moon programme is not isolated; it is linked to a larger vision of interplanetary exploration.

Global Race to the Moon

Unlike the 1960s and 1970s, the current lunar phase is multipolar.

Key Players

  • United States – Artemis programme
  • China – planning human landing by 2030 under the Chang’e Project
  • India – plans human landing by 2040 under Space Vision 2047
  • Japan – serious contender
  • European countries – expected to play important collaborative roles
  • Russia – less aggressive than others at present

This shows that lunar exploration has now become a field of strategic competition as well as international cooperation.

India’s Position and Opportunities

When Apollo 11 landed in 1969, ISRO did not yet exist; it was established within a month of that event. Today, India is no longer an observer but both a collaborator and a competitor in lunar exploration.

India’s Lunar Ambition

  • Human landing on the Moon targeted by 2040
  • Vision anchored in Space Vision 2047

Strategic Alignment

India is a signatory to the Artemis Accords, which are a set of non-binding bilateral principles for sustainable and peaceful civil space exploration, especially relating to the Moon and Mars.

Importance of Artemis Accords for India

  • Signals strategic alignment with the United States in space
  • Opens pathways for closer ISRO–NASA cooperation
  • Provides learning opportunities from NASA’s lunar experience

Existing Cooperation

  • India and the US already have strong cooperation, including the NISAR earth-observation joint mission

NASA has also said that its lunar plans will involve private industry, academic institutions, and international partners, which means India may gain valuable operational and technological experience that can support its own lunar programme.

Challenges and Concerns

1. Technical Delays

Artemis II has faced technical issues, especially related to:

  • hydrogen leaks
  • seal replacement
  • reduced hydrogen flow during tests
  • faulty ground support equipment

2. Timeline Slippages

NASA had only a narrow set of possible launch windows in March, with the risk of delay into April and beyond.

3. Cost and Complexity

Building a permanent Moon base requires repeated missions, logistics, technology integration, and sustained financing.

4. Deep Space Sustainability

Long-duration human presence on the Moon requires reliable systems for:

  • habitat creation
  • life support
  • fuel supply
  • local resource use

5. Strategic Rivalry

The new Moon race is also geopolitical, involving competition among major space powers.

Way Forward

  • NASA must ensure technical readiness of Artemis systems before crewed operations deepen
  • Sustainable lunar exploration will require continued cooperation with:
    • private industry
    • allied countries
    • scientific institutions
  • The Moon programme must remain linked to larger deep-space goals such as Mars exploration
  • India should use Artemis-related engagement to strengthen:
    • human spaceflight capability
    • lunar science
    • deep-space technology
    • global space partnerships

Conclusion

The Artemis II mission represents far more than a return to the Moon. It is part of a long-term strategy to establish sustained human presence on the lunar surface, build deep-space operational capacity, and prepare for future interplanetary missions. Unlike the Apollo era, the present phase of lunar exploration is collaborative, incremental, and aimed at permanence. For India, this evolving lunar order offers both strategic opportunities and technological lessons as it pursues its own long-term ambitions in human space exploration.

UPSC PYQ

Q. Consider the following space missions: (UPSC CSE 2025)

(a) Only one
(b) Only two
(c) All the three
(d) None

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

Statement I – Axiom-4: Correct
Axiom-4 is a private mission to the International Space Station (ISS). ISRO has collaborated to send an Indian astronaut (Gaganyatri), who will conduct microgravity experiments in space.

Statement II – SpaDeX: Correct
SpaDeX (Space Docking Experiment) uses the POEM platform (spent rocket stage) as an orbital laboratory. It carries multiple payloads designed for in-orbit microgravity research, including experiments by academia and startups.

Statement III – Gaganyaan: Correct
Gaganyaan, India’s human spaceflight mission, aims to send astronauts to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and provides opportunities for microgravity-based scientific experiments.

Hence, all three missions support micro-gravity research.

Therefore, option (c) is correct.

Additional Information:

  • Microgravity research helps in fields like material science, biotechnology, medicine, and fluid dynamics.
  • ISRO is increasingly focusing on space-based research ecosystems, involving private sector and academia.

CARE MCQ

Q. Consider the following statements:

  1. Artemis II is intended to carry astronauts around the Moon and back without landing.
  2. NASA’s current lunar strategy aims at establishing a long-term human presence on the Moon.
  3. India plans to send astronauts to the Moon by 2030.

How many of the above statements are correct?

A. Only one

B. Only two

C. All three

D. None

Answer: B

Explanation:

  • Statement 1 – Correct: Artemis II is a crewed flyby mission around the Moon.
  • Statement 2 – Correct: NASA’s goal is to lay the foundation for a permanent lunar base.
  • Statement 3 – Incorrect: India’s target for sending astronauts to the Moon is 2040, not 2030.

Relevance: GS Paper III – Indian Economy (Employment, Growth, Human Resource Development)

Important Keywords for Prelims and Mains

For Prelims:

  • PLFS, LFPR, WPR, Unemployment Rate (UR), Usual Status (ps+ss), Current Weekly Status (CWS)

For Mains:

  • Employment Trends, Labour Market Structure, Female Workforce Participation, Structural Transformation, Wage Employment

Why in News?

The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) Annual Report 2025 highlights trends in employment, unemployment, labour force participation, and sectoral shifts in India’s economy, indicating relative stability with gradual structural transformation.

What is the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS)?

The Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) was launched by the National Statistical Office (NSO) in 2017 with the objective of generating frequent and reliable labour market data.

It marked a shift from earlier employment surveys by providing timely and periodic estimates of employment and unemployment indicators.

Objectives of PLFS

 

The survey is designed to measure key labour market indicators using different approaches:

  • To estimate Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR), Worker Population Ratio (WPR), and Unemployment Rate (UR) at three-month intervals in urban areas using the Current Weekly Status (CWS) approach
  • To generate annual estimates for both rural and urban areas using:
    • Usual Status (Principal + Subsidiary Status)
    • Current Weekly Status (CWS)

This ensures a comprehensive and multi-dimensional understanding of employment patterns.

Key Indicators in PLFS

PLFS uses three core indicators to assess labour market conditions:

1. Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR)

  • Percentage of people who are either employed or seeking employment
  • Formula:
    • LFPR = (Labour Force / Total Population) × 100

2. Worker Population Ratio (WPR)

  • Percentage of employed persons in the population
  • Formula:
    • WPR = (Number of Employed / Total Population) × 100

3. Unemployment Rate (UR)

  • Percentage of unemployed persons among the labour force
  • Formula:
    • UR = (Unemployed / Labour Force) × 100

Key Highligts of PLFS, Annual Report 2025

Stable Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR)

  • Rural male LFPR: 80.5% (strong participation)
  • Rural female LFPR: 45.9% (stable, sustained gains)
  • Urban LFPR: Broadly unchanged from 2024
  • Based on usual status (ps+ss)
  • Indicates stability in labour force participation

Sustained Worker Population Ratio (WPR)

  • Overall WPR: Stable in 2025
  • Rural male WPR: 78.4%
  • Rural female WPR: 44.9%
  • Urban WPR: ~50%
  • Reflects sustained employment levels since 2022
Orion space craft

Declining and Stable Unemployment Rates (UR)

  • Rural unemployment: 2.4% (low)
  • Rural male UR: 2.6%
  • Rural female UR: 2.1% (lower than male)
  • Urban male UR: 4.2%
  • Urban female UR: 6.4%
  • Overall urban UR: 4.8%
  • Indicates better rural labour absorption, higher urban unemployment
Note

 

  • The survey covered almost the entire Indian Union Exception: Some villages in Andaman and Nicobar Islands due to difficult accessibility throughout the year
Orion space craft

Shift Towards Regular Wage Employment

Self-employment:

    • 57.5% → 56.2% (decline)
  • Regular wage/salaried:
    • 22.4% → 23.6% (increase)
    • Male: 25.4% → 26.5%
    • Female: 16.6% → 18.2%
  • Casual labour: ~20% (stable)
  • Shows shift towards formal employment

Manufacturing and service sectors witnessed enhanced worker participation

  • Agriculture:
    • 44.8% → 43.0% (decline, still largest)
  • Construction:
    • 12.3% → 12.0% (slight fall)
  • Manufacturing:
    • 11.6% → 12.1% (increase)
  • Services:
    • 12.2% → 13.1% (increase)
  • Indicates structural shift from agriculture to industry & services

Rising Earnings with Gender Improvements

  • Regular employment:
    • Male: ₹22,891 → ₹24,217 (+5.8%)
    • Female: ₹17,126 → ₹18,353 (+7.2%)
  • Self-employment:
    • Male: ₹16,893 → ₹17,914 (+6.0%)
    • Female: ₹5,861 → ₹6,374 (+8.8%)
  • Casual labour:
    • Male: Stable (~₹455)
    • Female: ₹299 → ₹315 (+5.4%)
  • Female earnings growing faster, but still lower overall

Challenges Associated

1. Gender-based Reasons for Labour Force Exit

  • There is a clear difference between men and women in reasons for remaining outside the labour force.
  • Example: Around 69.8% of males stay out due to education, whereas 44.4% of females remain out due to childcare and domestic responsibilities.
  • This reflects deep-rooted social and economic constraints on women’s participation.

2. Inequality in Working Hours

  • A notable gap exists in the number of hours worked by men and women.
  • Example: In urban self-employment, males work 17.5 hours more per week than females.
  • This indicates that women are engaged more in unpaid domestic work, reducing their economic participation.

3. High NEET Population

  • A significant share of youth is not engaged in productive activities.
  • Example: About 25% of persons aged 15–29 are Not in Employment, Education or Training (NEET).
  • This may lead to loss of demographic advantage.

4. Limited Vocational Training

  • Skill development remains inadequate.
  • Example: Only 4.2% of people (15–59 years) have received formal vocational/technical training.
  • This shows a large skill gap in the workforce.

5. Issues in Data Comparability

  • Changes in methodology affect comparison over time.
  • Example: The 2025 survey uses a new sampling design and calendar-year format, making it difficult to directly compare with earlier reports.

Way Forward

1. Reducing Gender Gap

  • Promote affordable childcare services and flexible working arrangements.
  • Encourage women’s participation through supportive policies and workplace reforms.

2. Expanding Skill Development

  • Strengthen initiatives like Skill India Mission.
  • Increase vocational training coverage from 4.2% to higher levels to meet industrial needs.

3. Addressing Urban Youth Unemployment

  • Promote start-ups and service sector growth in Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities.
  • Focus on employment generation in urban areas.

4. Promoting Formal Employment

  • Encourage shift towards regular salaried jobs.
  • Expand social security coverage for workers.

5. Engaging NEET Youth

  • Introduce bridge courses, internships, and apprenticeship programmes.
  • Target the 25% inactive youth population for skill integration.

Conclusion

The PLFS 2025 report indicates that India’s labour market is showing signs of stability and structural transformation, especially towards manufacturing and formal employment. However, challenges such as high NEET levels, gender disparities, and low skill development continue to limit progress. Addressing these issues is essential for effectively utilising India’s demographic potential in the coming years.

UPSC PYQ

Q. Consider the following statements regarding Annual Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) report 2023–24 by the National Statistical Organisation (NSO):

  1. The agriculture sector remains dominant in employment, with its share rising from about 44% in 2017–18 to about 46% in 2023–24.
  2. The share of female workers in agriculture has increased during the period 2017–18 to 2023–24.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

A. 1 only

B. 2 only

C. Both 1 and 2

D. Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: C

CARE MCQ

Q. With reference to the Conceptual Framework of Key Indicators in the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), consider the following statements:

  1. Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) is the percentage of persons in the labour force in the population.
  2. Worker Population Ratio (WPR) is the percentage of unemployed persons among the persons in the labour force.
  3. Unemployment Rate (UR) is the percentage of unemployed persons among the persons in the labour force.
  4. Current Weekly Status (CWS) is determined on the basis of the activity status of a person during the last 7 days preceding the date of survey.

How many of the above statements are correct?

  1. Only one
  2. Only two
  3. Only three
  4. All four

Answer: C

Explanation

  • Statement 1 – Correct:
    LFPR refers to the percentage of persons in the labour force (that is, working or seeking/available for work) in the total population.
  • Statement 2 – Incorrect:
    WPR does not mean percentage of unemployed persons in the labour force.
    WPR is the percentage of employed persons in the population.
  • Statement 3 – Correct:
    UR is defined as the percentage of persons unemployed among the persons in the labour force.
  • Statement 4 – Correct:
    Current Weekly Status (CWS) is determined on the basis of the last 7 days preceding the date of survey.

Additional Information

  • Usual Status is determined on the basis of the last 365 days preceding the date of survey.
  • Principal activity status (ps) refers to the activity on which a person spent the major part of time during the reference period.
  • Subsidiary status (ss) refers to an additional economic activity performed for 30 days or more during the 365-day reference period.
  • In PLFS, the commonly used indicators are LFPR, WPR, and UR.
 
APPSC Current Affairs March 31st 2026
APPSC Daily Current Affairs 26th March 2026

Enroll Now for Unlimited UPSC Utsav

Start Date

22/03/2026

Timings

08 AM – 4 PM

    Courses

    Scroll to Top